getpriority, setpriority — get/set program scheduling priority


#include <sys/resource.h>
int getpriority( int which,
  id_t who);
int setpriority( int which,
  id_t who,
  int prio);


The scheduling priority of the process, process group, or user, as indicated by which and who is obtained with the getpriority() call and set with the setpriority() call. The process attribute dealt with by these system calls is the same attribute (also known as the "nice" value) that is dealt with by nice(2).

The value which is one of PRIO_PROCESS, PRIO_PGRP, or PRIO_USER, and who is interpreted relative to which (a process identifier for PRIO_PROCESS, process group identifier for PRIO_PGRP, and a user ID for PRIO_USER). A zero value for who denotes (respectively) the calling process, the process group of the calling process, or the real user ID of the calling process.

The prio argument is a value in the range −20 to 19 (but see NOTES below), with −20 being the highest priority and 19 being the lowest priority. Attempts to set a priority outside this range are silently clamped to the range. The default priority is 0; lower values give a process a higher scheduling priority.

The getpriority() call returns the highest priority (lowest numerical value) enjoyed by any of the specified processes. The setpriority() call sets the priorities of all of the specified processes to the specified value.

Traditionally, only a privileged process could lower the nice value (i.e., set a higher priority). However, since Linux 2.6.12, an unprivileged process can decrease the nice value of a target process that has a suitable RLIMIT_NICE soft limit; see getrlimit(2) for details.


On success, getpriority() returns the calling thread's nice value, which may be a negative number. On error, it returns −1 and sets errno to indicate the error.

Since a successful call to getpriority() can legitimately return the value −1, it is necessary to clear errno prior to the call, then check errno afterward to determine if −1 is an error or a legitimate value.

setpriority() returns 0 on success. On failure, it returns −1 and sets errno to indicate the error.



The caller attempted to set a lower nice value (i.e., a higher process priority), but did not have the required privilege (on Linux: did not have the CAP_SYS_NICE capability).


which was not one of PRIO_PROCESS, PRIO_PGRP, or PRIO_USER.


A process was located, but its effective user ID did not match either the effective or the real user ID of the caller, and was not privileged (on Linux: did not have the CAP_SYS_NICE capability). But see NOTES below.


No process was located using the which and who values specified.


POSIX.1-2001, POSIX.1-2008, SVr4, 4.4BSD (these interfaces first appeared in 4.2BSD).


For further details on the nice value, see sched(7).

[Note] Note

the addition of the "autogroup" feature in Linux 2.6.38 means that the nice value no longer has its traditional effect in many circumstances. For details, see sched(7).

A child created by fork(2) inherits its parent's nice value. The nice value is preserved across execve(2).

The details on the condition for EPERM depend on the system. The above description is what POSIX.1-2001 says, and seems to be followed on all System V-like systems. Linux kernels before 2.6.12 required the real or effective user ID of the caller to match the real user of the process who (instead of its effective user ID). Linux 2.6.12 and later require the effective user ID of the caller to match the real or effective user ID of the process who. All BSD-like systems (SunOS 4.1.3, Ultrix 4.2, 4.3BSD, FreeBSD 4.3, OpenBSD-2.5, ...) behave in the same manner as Linux 2.6.12 and later.

C library/kernel differences

Within the kernel, nice values are actually represented using the range 40..1 (since negative numbers are error codes) and these are the values employed by the setpriority() and getpriority() system calls. The glibc wrapper functions for these system calls handle the translations between the user-land and kernel representations of the nice value according to the formula unice = 20 − knice. (Thus, the kernel's 40..1 range corresponds to the range −20..19 as seen by user space.)


According to POSIX, the nice value is a per-process setting. However, under the current Linux/NPTL implementation of POSIX threads, the nice value is a per-thread attribute: different threads in the same process can have different nice values. Portable applications should avoid relying on the Linux behavior, which may be made standards conformant in the future.


nice(1), renice(1), fork(2), capabilities(7), sched(7)

Documentation/scheduler/sched−nice−design.txt in the Linux kernel source tree (since Linux 2.6.23)


This page is part of release 5.13 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, information about reporting bugs, and the latest version of this page, can be found at−pages/.

  Copyright (c) 1980, 1991 The Regents of the University of California.
All rights reserved.

Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
are met:
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
   notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
   notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
   documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
   must display the following acknowledgement:
This product includes software developed by the University of
California, Berkeley and its contributors.
4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
   may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
   without specific prior written permission.


    (#)getpriority.2 6.9 (Berkeley) 3/10/91

Modified 1993-07-24 by Rik Faith <>
Modified 1996-07-01 by Andries Brouwer <>
Modified 1996-11-06 by Eric S. Raymond <>
Modified 2001-10-21 by Michael Kerrisk <>
   Corrected statement under EPERM to clarify privileges required
Modified 2002-06-21 by Michael Kerrisk <>
   Clarified meaning of 0 value for 'who' argument
Modified 2004-05-27 by Michael Kerrisk <>